Talk:VisualWorks

The large chunk of verbiage dumped at the top of the page on July 30/31 seems completely irrelevant and out of place. If there is indeed a company named VisualWorks then surely a separate page and a disambiguation page are required. ? Oh and visualworks is not the language. VisualWorks is the product name; Smalltalk is the language. 99.199.170.131 (talk) 21:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. Well, about the verbiage being irrelevant. There was too much adness and too little useful info for it to merit its own page, though, so it's just gone. CHaoTiCa (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I find it strange that there is a section on undeclared variables. It seems like such a small matter to have its own section.

Installation

Should the article really contain information about the install? I think not. --86.103.194.144 16:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Buggiest Smalltalk?

Is the (unsourced) line at the top of the page regarding VisualWorks as "probably one of the buggiest" implementations of Smalltalk truly accurate? Can anyone provide more details? Foolingmachine 19:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I used it for seven years, it's one of the least buggiest programming environments I've ever encountered. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.211.237.19 (talk) 19:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OMG this is just an advertising. Adding a template and editing some information (... "free. Get it here"????!!!!! OMG!!!). —Preceding unsigned comment added by HavokCR (talk • contribs) 23:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citations for "Benefits and drawbacks"

I've made some changes to #Benefits_and_drawbacks, but there aren't many references on the just-in-time compiler and garbage collector used in VisualWorks. Does anyone have any resources about those? It would be nice to have some references. 175.34.39.241 (talk) 00:33, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]