Talk:Vision in fish
Appearance
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from Vision in fish appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 October 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Title
[edit]Should this be "vision in fish" or the current "vision in fishes"?
Not sure if the term used generally would be fishes (plural) in this context. Robertlerner (talk) 03:42, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- My impression is that the entire article is written using cute language. I don't think there's anything wrong with that. "Vision in fishes" is abnormal English, but not overtly incorrect. IronMaidenRocks (talk) 04:15, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- B-Class Fishes articles
- Mid-importance Fishes articles
- WikiProject Fishes articles
- B-Class Animal anatomy articles
- Mid-importance Animal anatomy articles
- WikiProject Animal anatomy articles
- B-Class neuroscience articles
- Low-importance neuroscience articles