This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
Much of this article speaks of the Swamiji in practically slavish terms, like he was a god. This article is written like an obituary rather than an encyclopedia article. For example, it uses an honourific "ji" which should not be used on Wikipedia, being an encyclopedia. Also, WTF does this mean?: "he carried on his spiritual activities with equal vigour and endeared thousands of devotees with his inclusive approach." I see absolutely no proof of this anywhere in the article, and this seems to be a ham-handed attempt to "ward off" those who may cite his casteist/Brahminical teachings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by C1MM (talk • contribs) 00:27, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]