Talk:Vishuddha Siddhanta Panjika

ρ

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vishuddha Siddhanta Panjika article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

new link

the free mobile bengali panjika / bangabda calculation program link may be included in external link section http://www.myjavaserver.com/~sourav/tithi/Tithi.htm it may increase public awareness

Needs cleanup

Needs cleanup for more neutral presentation JQ 05:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would be thankful and am ready to re-write if you please point out the non-neutral points here. VMO 02:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help on this. As an example, the article has "Vishuddha siddhanta panjika provides valuable articles on astrology and useful information on astronomy;". It would be better put as "Vishuddha siddhanta panjika provides articles on astrology and information on astronomy;". Remove words and points of argument that praise the almanac, and stick to describing what it is. Quote (with citations if possible) people who endorse the almanac, but don't describe them as famous, eminent and so on.JQ 04:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the changes. Can the cleanup tag be removed? VMO 06:31, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]