Talk:Virtual tuning

This page was proposed for deletion by ukexpat (talk · contribs) on 30 March 2010 with the comment:
Fails GNG
It was contested by 124.176.154.173 (talk · contribs) on April 4, 2010 with the comment:
Page more than meets minimum notability needs. Thousands of members are active in the forums linked. There is far less meaningful content in Wikipedia than this.

Virtual tuning was proposed for deletion by Ukexpat noted as "Non-notable - fails WP:GNG."

As someone else commented after it was proposed for deletion 'Page more than meets minimum notability needs. Thousands of members are active in the forums linked. There is far less meaningful content in Wikipedia than this.'

I will source additional citations, but the subject is definitely notable. Automotive Designz (talk) 04:17, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, "thousands of members" "active in the forums" does not make a subject notable as that term is defined for Wikipedia puposes. You will need non-trivial coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Without that, this is destined for Afd. – ukexpat (talk) 02:33, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the record should anyone have an issue with this article in the future, the following additional citations were added on the 5th April 2010:

Patton, Phil (2004-10-27). "CUSTOM BUILT; Dad to Virtual Rad? Call the Digimodders". The New York Times.

Autemo.com: transform your car … virtually". Yellowwheels.

Chop Shop", Banzai Magazine, Issue 98(2009) Automotive Designz (talk) 07:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]