Talk:Virology

Viruses Top‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microbiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1

Merger with Virus

I suggested way back in 2009 merging this neglected article with Virus. There is very little here that is not covered in Virus and it's progeny articles History of virology and Social history of viruses. Comments please on the Virus Talk Page . Graham Beards (talk) 11:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Following a discussion at Virus, I have withdrawn the suggestion and I have decided to improve the article. Graham Beards (talk) 14:45, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Obelisk - merger(s) would help?

Currently - seems there's several wikilinks to the purportedly newly discovered life form "obelisk" - "Obelisk (virology)" and "Obelisk (life form)" and "Obelisk (viroid)" - perhaps some merger(s) would help? - Comments Welcome - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 13:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At least two of these three names are a bit problematic:

Obelisk (life form): Many scientists don't consider viruses as life forms, for subviral agents it is even more doubtful.
Obelisk (viroid): The references consider obelisks as substantially different from known viroids, we should await the position of ICTV for both update of The International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature and updated and ratified ICTV Virus Taxonomy containing obelisks (to be mentioned: 1. there is no proposal yet for implementing obelisks, so it could pend some years; 2. the circular form of their RNA is similar to viroids, but obelisks contain genes that are unlike any discovered so far in other genoms, which may indicate a completely new realm).
Obelisk (virology) is O.K. due to Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Naming the specific topic articles, but the parenthetical disambiguation specifies the context to which the topic applies, not the generic class. The options could be Obelisk (viruslike entity) or Obelisk (viroid-like entity).

Petr Karel (talk) 15:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or Obelisk (subviral agent)? Graham Beards (talk) 16:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any of the above are fine by me, but please discuss on that article's talk page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Anth1913

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2024 and 10 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Liz1103 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Liz1103 (talk) 15:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]