Talk:Virgil Griffith

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Alabama

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles

Cryptocurrency

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Wikipedia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Romanpoet (talk · contribs) / Griffith, Virgil Griffith, Virgil

Scanner at Wired's Threat Level

"Wikipedia hired him [2] to create the Wikipedia Scanner, a tool to analyze anonymous edits being made to Wikipedia."

The Wikimedia Foundation did not hire Virgil to create Wikipedia Scanner. Vishal-WMF 12:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source? I have a source that says that they did. Unless there's a source to oppose that, I'd say that sourced information is more accurate than unsourced claims. 123.2.168.215 13:56, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vote On the Most Shameful Wikipedia Spin Jobs By Kevin Poulsen ←Ben^B4 14:13, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slashdotted. :) -El on ka 19:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Virgil's powerspinner mousetrap makes BBC, with decent mentions. [1]. Go team! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Surrogate Spook (talk • contribs) 19:19, August 15, 2007

I added the Shameful spin part to the scanner entry. Slashdot is merely commenting on it, and isn't newsworthy in this case. 123.2.168.215 12:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was Virgil hired by Wikipedia to create the Wikipedia Scanner?

This is a rather extraordinary claim. As such it requires a strong source. OhMyNews in Korea is not a sufficient source for this claim because it is self-described as a community written newspaper. There no indication of fact checking. Those who disagree may start a discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Please don't edit war. Thanks. - Jehochman ^Talk 15:03, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The removal by a WMF employee has been added to Wired's list of most shameful Wikipedia spins. It is currently listed as the number 1 most shameful. See here: http://wired.reddit.com/wikidgame/ It seems that it was a bad idea to remove that link. 123.2.168.215 17:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just came here from Wired... why did the Wikipedia employees like this Mr. Vishal take out real news articles from here? Is that allowed? Sorry I didn't know that they controlled content over others, if so please disregard this question. Thanks... 88.198.180.61 17:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because the source isn't reliable. If this information were true, it is interesting enough that it would be published some place reliable. OhmyNews allows anyone to publish any crackpot theory. - Jehochman ^Talk 17:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ludwig put his name to it, and he didn't state it as a theory, he stated it as fact. If it is false, then WMF should sue him for libel. Why isn't WMF suing him? Why would he state something as fact, putting his name to it, if it was false? Ludwig has a very high reputation for being very accurate. 123.2.168.215 17:32, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You could ask Ludwig whether he'd put his name to a rumor and call it fact. - Jehochman ^Talk 17:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources people, please. Is there any indication that the writer of the ohmynews article is an expert in the subject area or has sources that we don't know about? Reliable publications are those with an established structure for fact-checking and editorial oversight (from Wikipedia:Reliable sources). --- RockMFR 20:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, let me get this straight: a user on a web site says that the WMF hired Virgil Griffith. The WMF says they did not hire Virgil Griffith. But we're supposed to rely on the user's statement as the source of fact? That sounds fishy to me. User:RockMFR could say I work for Google, but that wouldn't make it so. Rstandefer 20:54, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

123 was blocked as the sock of a banned user. - Jehochman ^Talk 21:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Virgil himself has said that he was not hired - http://virgil.gr/31.html, near the bottom. 86.130.75.236 07:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Penny Arcade

This comic is obviously about Wikipedia Scanner... But, is it relevant enough to link?[2] --El on ka 21:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The scanner in popular culture? It's been all over the press for the past week ... - David Gerard 14:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I hadn't noted the scanner had its own article ... it'd belong there, not here IMO - David Gerard 14:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minor changes to article regarding legal stuff

I made two edits to this article regarding legal details and am officially declaring my potential WP:COI. I provided a citation for each edit. If there's an issue let me know. Romanpoet (talk) 19:46, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Virgil Griffith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091120204144/http://www.santafe.edu:80/profiles/?pid=288 to http://www.santafe.edu/profiles/?pid=288
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://chronicle.com/free/2003/04/2003041601t.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Virgil Griffith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Virgil Griffith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.interz0ne.com/events/Blackboard_Restr_Order.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140213233154/http://www.binrev.com/forums/index.php/files/category/3-binary-revolution-radio/ to http://www.binrev.com/forums/index.php/files/category/3-binary-revolution-radio/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ethereum people category added

The category People Involved with Ethereum (or however it is phrased) was added to the article in mid-September 2018. I don't see any mention of Virgil's Ethereum involvement in the article though. Can someone source this? If not, please remove the category.--FeralOink (talk) 14:04, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's two obvious places, I suppose my LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/virgilgr/) as well as the Casper paper I wrote with Vitalik, a rather central paper. (https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09437) Romanpoet (talk) 02:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issue of the trial

Did Virgil got jailed at last or no? Or condemned? The article does not state it. The article nees to be actualised.

Updated to reflect guilty plea Hugh Mason (talk) 13:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]