Talk:Violin Concerto (Barber)

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Don't you think it would be better to move it back to "Violin concerto (Barber)" since firstly, every other violin concerto on wikipedia is under "Violin concerto (Composer)," and secondly, "violin concerto" is not so much a title as a genre description, and comes more under convention than actual fact. I mean, we don't put Brahms's concerto under "Violinkonzert (Brahms)". Cheers. --Quadalpha 16:14, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's not true, though- every other concerto here is under Violin Concerto (composer) - note caps. This is the only one on my watchlist under, rather than above, "Violin concerto". The name as it was before the two moves was the right one, because of the site manual of style: Violin Concerto (Barber). Schissel | Sound the Note! 14:32, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All the links point to Violin Concerto (Barber) as well. DavidRF 16:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a problem that Violin Concerto (Barber) does not come up in response to a search for "Barber Violin Concerto." that search gave two pages about the casts of ballets that have been performed to this piece but no listing of the name of the page that actually discusses the concerto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.194.34.254 (talk) 10:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that http://www.isobriselli.com/ flatly contradicts the account repeated here, and claims it was a fiction invented by Nathan Broder for his 1954 book. Someone with more expertise than me should revise, or perhaps mention the controversy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.244.163.79 (talk) 21:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did something get dropped?

"Herbert Baumel was known to be an excellent sight reader, and he was asked to study the finale for a couple of hours, then to join him in pianist Josef Hofmann's studio. After reviewing the music, Baumel went to the studio to discover an audience of Barber (now teaching at Curtis), Gian Carlo Menotti, Mary Louise Curtis Bok (founder of the Curtis Institute), and a friend of Mrs. Bok." - okay, and then what happened? This appears to have lead to some sort or performance or discussion or what? HammerFilmFan (talk) 14:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Break History into short account and add Controversy

I wonder if this would not be improved for most readers by having the History section reduced to a good paragraph, and the bulk of it moved to a new Controversy section at the end. As is, History is a bit of a whale that eclipses the Violin Concerto itself. jb (talk) 00:02, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Violin Concerto (Barber). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110723235858/http://start1g.ovh.net/~samuelbau/discographie.html to http://start1g.ovh.net/~samuelbau/discographie.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]