Talk:Village Reconstruction Organization
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 10 March 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I went through about 40 Google refs until they ran out and conclude that organizations that serve illiterate "untouchables" are not likely to get much press coverage. There is plenty of coverage by Jesuit sources (presumably not third party). @SwisterTwister: Jzsj (talk) 04:58, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- In this case, if it's still significant (but not simply announcements or mentions), it can be used. SwisterTwister talk 04:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've gone over them again with this in mind, but they usually draw on the sources already listed here. I suggest that there are several very significant independent references in the article that greatly support what those connected with VRO say of the work. Also, the last Annual Report (referenced) seems objective and quite indicative. Jzsj (talk) 11:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- I've added more specific material from the references and added a few references like Facebook and blogspot. Jzsj (talk) 06:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC)