This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Viking Airlines article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Defunct airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the Defunct Airlines task force.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wetleasing due to SAS Q400 problems?

I heard that Viking Airlines are making lot of money to help SAS with wetleasing to replace the Q400s, anyone got any info about that? RGDS Alexmcfire

Proposed merge

Viking Airlines destinations is a short page (2kb) that consists solely of a list of airports where Viking Airlines flies. It could easily be merged to the section 'Destinations' of Viking Airlines. Cnilep (talk) 15:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Against - Guidelines recommend to create a separate page for destinations if there are 10+. Please see WP:AIRLINES to understand more on why separate destination articles. This article is no different to any other airline destination articles. Zaps93 (talk) 15:35, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note discussion at the WikiProject as well as this and this AfD suggesting that this guideline is somewhat controversial and does not have the strength of policy. On the other hand, Viking Airlines has destinations in ten countries, whereas Porter Airlines, whose destinations page was deleted, only has destinations in Canada and the US. Cnilep (talk) 16:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Porter Airlines just had over 10, not by much therefore they didn't see the point, but judging by the scale of Viking Airlines destinations, I don't see how it is any different to British Airways destinations. Zaps93 (talk) 21:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Im just saying that it is best not to merge the viking airlines destinations page because most airlines have a seperate destination page. It could well be in the future that the airline could get large and could cause a lot of space of the page to be used. Thanks. --MKY661 (talk) 11:54, 28 April 2010 (UTC) Also, just to let you know that i created viking Airlinews Destinations. It was my first page that i had created.[reply]

Viking Hellas

Added short Viking Hellas reference due to use of Viking Airlines' domain name, and to link to Viking Hellas main article (note similarity of logo...) Not sure if affiliate is the right term though so welcome comments. Warren Whyte (talk) 11:37, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Viking Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]