Jump to content

Talk:Video production

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Question for administrator

[edit]

<Hi, I added a few relevant photos of various aspects of the video production process and gave credit to my company as well as other relevant info and then "Theroadislong" said it was spam and said I would be banned if I tried to re-post, but the content was relevant - can you please review and offer guidance, I don't want to be banned. Thank you!>

--Flyingyoyo1337 (talk) 19:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk to other user, if you cannot agree - Wikipedia:Dispute resolution Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:30, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

comment

[edit]

Hmm, there's an edit to this article dated 30th of Jan that has my name to it... but which I definitely did not make! My password wasn't an easy one to crack... but I'll change it anyway.

It was the same text added by 67.123.17.43 on 2nd Dec, 2005: "blackpeple rule". Curious. Poweroid 16:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article appears to be more of a link farm than a real article with good information. I'm deleting the links to production companies.

I removed the following links to production companies from the article. Danielbot 08:57, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article quality

[edit]

I'm afraid this is a very poor article: vague, sketchy, and inaccurate (by definition, a video production company does not "film.") Also, video production is moving aggressively into the broadcast/cable and theatrical areas that were once exclusively film.

I suggest: --Create a brief new article that is at least more accurate and substantive. --Monitor the rapid and bewildering changes in the film/video/TV world until both technologies and business models mature and settle down.Jim Stinson 22:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.videomaker.com/learn/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:12, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Challenged Material

[edit]

In the first paragraph it states, without any reference, "It is the equivalent of filmmaking, but with images recorded electronically instead of film stock." Modern films do not use film stock much like they used to. In fact, most analog mediums, like film stock and VHS tapes, are basically obsolete in this digital era. This statement is not necessarily valid, it's not modern, and it has no sources or references. I am challenging it to be changed, or I will change it myself if necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.139.19.96 (talk) 22:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Distance Education

[edit]

The paragraphs concerning distance education, particularly through Internet broadcast are written poorly. "Students were able to watch the underwater archaeology in real time and ask questions of the scientists exploring the shipwreck. The twice-daily live distance learning programs reached an estimated 1600 students from as far away as Canada during the five days of broadcasting." Online education (internet education, such as Khan Academy) can be considered distance-learning, but "as far away as Canada" is inaccurate, and oddly written as anyone with the link (assuming there are no geo-restrictions) could view the content. It is not as if it is distance learning offered through mail which only caters to the United States, and parts of Canada. --Lumpy Berserk (talk) 04:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Video production. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Video_production&oldid=1239190171"