Talk:Video game/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Quick-failed due to the fact that there are large portions as well as whole (sub)sections of completely unsourced information as well as many valid {{fact}} tags remaining. It clearly does not meet criterion 3 requiring verifiability. Prose and layout are also still very inconsistent. This article still has quite a few improvements to make before considering for GA. You may re-nominate for GA when these issues are resolved. Sorry, MuZemike 22:16, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ooops. I wonder how I missed some of that stuff, I looked over the article many times. Sorry if this was a waste of time. Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 22:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- No worries. Add sources, improve some of the writing, get it peer reviewed, and it'll be up there. MuZemike 18:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)