Talk:VideoSift

Videosift Screenshot

Ah, the videosift screenshot image has been deleted again - whoever next uploads a screenshot, please take care to follow the upload instructions to make sure the image complies with Wiki policy. Thanks. Krupo 04:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikify and consolidation

The article needs to be wikified. I think alot of the current sections need to be subbed into and under "CONCEPT". --Farhadz 21:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganized the article a bit.--Farhadz 21:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some Resources For the VS Wiki

[1] - Early BlogReader article on VS.
[2] - Basic information about community members.
--Farhadz 10:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Farhadz (talk • contribs) 10:02, 9 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Definition Of VideoSift

I think "Video voting community" sounds horrible, I like Video aggregator more. But I know it's not a defined word. Thoughts? --Farhadz 10:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed; edit made. Hmm - some connecting to the concept of Sifting is probably appropriate too. --Krupo 18:30, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lists

I don't think the full lists of gold star invocations, star levels or accepted video hosts are necessary. AGGoH 11:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that perhaps the full list of Gold Star invocations, and levels are necessary. But I think the video hosts accepted should be left as a technical entry. --Farhadz 11:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- That makes sense to me. AGGoH 11:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WorldTV Internet Charts

After giving it a little though, I figure that link, just added today, is fair - it's an example of Videosift's prominence in the online video world: only Google Video, Youtube and digg share that page with Videosift. And it's significant for being quoted in other media (I think a major UK paper had an article about it), so it's indirect/direct press for Videosift as well. Just including this observation here for the record as a neutral party (full disclosure: I am also on Videosift with the same ID, however, I've been a Wikipedian longer) in case anyone questions that link. Krupo 03:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on VideoSift. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070315001517/http://www.pcworld.com:80/article/id,128248-page,13-c,sites/article.html to http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,128248-page,13-c,sites/article.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]