Talk:Videndum

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Videndum or Vinten?

This page seems to have a somewhat split focus as it discusses both Vinten, a manufacturer of camera supports and robotic equipment, and its owner Videndum (and the predecessor group companies). I suggest that a stand-alone article on Videndum would not be significant but it should be separated from this article on Vinten in some form - perhaps moved to a subsection? I would particularly like to hear from @Dormskirk about this. Tvcameraop (talk) 13:19, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - The article, as previously drafted, was of very poor quality: it was very badly sourced, neglected to cover the recent history including the recent rebranding of the company to Videndum, and was very much in need of attention. Hence I have done a lot of work to improve the referencing and also some of the prose. Vivendum will become of increasing significance because of the recent announcement by FTSE Russell that it is expected to join the FTSE 250 Index at the next review in September (see here). The history of Videndum is the history of Vinten – certainly up to 1995. (see here). Hence my original logic of having just one article on Vivendum / Vinten. That said, I understand your point. I have moved some of the material on the Vinten brand back to Vinten and have expanded the Videndum article to include a bit on other brands. I would be very happy to see further expansion of both articles as long as the material is properly sourced (which it was not before). I hope you are OK with that. Dormskirk (talk) 17:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great work - all looks good to me! Will look at expanding both articles when I have the time. Tvcameraop (talk) 21:00, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lowepro

Shouldn't Lowepro be added to the list of Vivendum brands? According to the Lowepro page, I think it should. 2A01:E0A:A06:7530:D4DD:6864:8076:A74F (talk) 00:32, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]