Talk:Victorian Open

Golf Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Victoria / Sports Low‑importance

	Australia portal Victorian Open is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

I don't know about that "low importance" category, as it sure does seem to indicate that on certain pages good grammar isn't as important as on other pages. I think somebody should come up with better vocabulary. Just a thought, because I have a point to make about spelling:

"In 2002 Stolz beta Bransdon with a par on the second extra hole."

Of course, "beta" should be "beat".

And I do not feel that I know what I'm doing so this one should be edited by some professional or veteran, please. Might be true of my earlier grammar point I made on another page.

Bottom line is I don't know my way around here.

But that "low importance" designation just seems incorrect. Wrong mindset. All spelling mistakes and grammar mistakes are important anywhere around here.

EDIT: I did the change myself out on the main page, or whatever that is referred to as.

M-Nyby (talk) 12:36, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edit. I'm in the process of making some major changes to this article. "Low" importance is a bit of a "catch-all". Over 90% of golf articles are "low". Probably needs a big shake-up. Nigej (talk) 12:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]