Talk:Victoria Square Shopping Centre

Belfast High‑importance

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belfast, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the City of Belfast, Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.BelfastWikipedia:WikiProject BelfastTemplate:WikiProject BelfastBelfast-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Northern Ireland Mid‑importance

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Rename article to Victoria Square, Belfast

I think that the article at Victoria Square, Belfast should be deleted and the little content on that page be incorporated here and this article renamed to Victoria Square, Belfast. Comments? Bjmullan (talk) 23:59, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved as proposed; but it's clearly absurd to have two titles identical except for punctuation, so I've moved this one to Victoria Square Shopping Centre (Belfast) until a better solution is proposed. Kotniski (talk) 13:38, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Square (Belfast) → Victoria Square, Belfast — The article currently at Victoria Square, Belfast contains a single sentence which could be easily incorporated into this article. Bjmullan (talk) 13:42, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, I think. Is there an actual square that is a postal address, or is it an "area" as the other article says? Either way, developments and streets etc should not really be mixed up, pathetic though the current stub is. If the development now covers the entire area of the former square, that is a different matter. Johnbod (talk) 23:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What I was thinking was to have the "area" still as the main article and to have the development as a major part of the body. This would allow the area to be expanded at a future date. Bjmullan (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But is it an actual square; there must have been one once - is it still there? Johnbod (talk) 00:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. This RM is the product of a merge request, and some misleading advice given to the proposer, see Talk:Victoria Square, Belfast. What is required is a merge, not a move, and it needs discussion to decide on the eventual name and process to get there. Andrewa (talk) 02:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Give me some redeem code

Give me reedem code Laxmi deviiiii (talk) 18:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]