Talk:Victoria Lundblad
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Question
[edit]I just created this new page on National Academy member Victoria Lundblad. I am a new editor, having recently completed training at WikiEd. I am not sure whether I should add material on the lawsuit Lundblad filed against the Salk Institute about gender discrimination. Input welcome.LLMHoopes (talk) 13:33, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi LLMHoopes. If the topic is treated as notable by reliable sources, you should add it similarly as you would anything else that someone is notable for. Natureium (talk) 14:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
The test is "unduly negative". This biog has good balance and describes her well. I added a bit more and also tweeted an appeal for a pic. Thanks for this. Thank you tweet here Victuallers (talk) 10:45, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Women scientists articles
- Low-importance Women scientists articles
- WikiProject Women scientists articles
- WikiProject Women in Red meetup 2018 articles
- All WikiProject Women in Red pages