Talk:Vickers Warwick

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vickers Warwick article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Re: developed from

Contrary to popular belief the warwick actually pre-dates the wellington, but only just as they were designed concurrently to two different specifications. The true progenitor of both designs is the Vickers B.9/32 prototype which also spawned the Wellesley. I can't actually put this in the article as I don't have my reference sources with me, so if any body feels like doing a little reading Get Vickers aircraft since 1908. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petebutt (talk • contribs) 18:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It sort of says this at the moment - it says the Wellington and Warwick were designed in parallel. As you say, both were derived from the Vickers Type 271 (i.e. the B9/32) (which is covered in the Wellington Article) with the Wellington being the definative B9/32 design and the Warwick meeting B1/35. What I can't find any references for is the statement that prototypes were cancelled in 1936 due to a decision to switch to 4 engined bombers (which is why I tagged it).Nigel Ish (talk) 19:16, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The B.1/35 Warwick design was started first as a complete re-design of the Vickers Type 271 that had been built to B.9/32 using 2,000 hp engines that were expected to become available, and the Wellington was then designed as a smaller version of the Warwick to fit and be re-submitted for specification B.9/32, and which flew earlier because it was designed to use already existing ~1,000 hp engines. The Warwick's 2,000 hp engines (Vulture, Sabre, Centaurus) were then delayed by the start of the war in 1939. By the time these engines were developed enough to be usable, around 1942, the Air Ministry had already decided upon the Avro Lancaster. Thus the Wellington was actually a scaled-down Warwick, and not the other way round.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.173.73 (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]