This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
– Maybe an eager move, but there is only one article within the current mainspace. There are no mentions to "Very Nice" in Borat's article, the only Dermansky novel with an article is a stub, and only one album under the record label has an article, plus the label would likely be "Very Nice Records" if it had an article. Not to say these other things wont eventually be notable, but in the meantime I would say the song is WP:PRIMARYTOPICOrangesclub (talk) 06:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (talk) 06:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (talk) 03:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with it, although I do respect it isn't easy comparing songs and novels. Going off of WP:DETERMINEPRIMARY, I'm not having any luck getting WikiNav to work but the second point on article traffic heavily favours Seventeen (South Korean band) over Marcy Dermansky, and comparing views on corresponding pieces of work The Red Car and Hot (Seventeen song) also favours Seventeen. Looking at the Google Trends [1] the song really seems more notable to me. I believe that the vast majority of readers searching up "Very Nice" will be looking for the song. Orangesclub (talk) 06:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to add now that the song article has been up for a few days we have view counts: [3] The song gets the vast majority of the traffic. Orangesclub (talk) 13:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, Borat's well known catch phrase is probably the common meaning of this term, so the disamb relieves any surprises. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per consistency with things like Twice. None of these oppose arguments hold any, any water at all. WP:NWFCTM is strong here. There is only one reasonable article to be looking for here, and that should be the primary topic. RedSlash06:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I don't find any of the arguments against this move to be convincing. It hasn't even been shown whether the Dermansky novel is notable, let alone a reasonable contender for the primary topic, and the fact that Borat's catchphrase isn't even mentioned in the Borat Sagdiyev article suggests that it's not a particularly significant component of the character's notability. The song seems like a clear WP:PTOPIC to me. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 18:37, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Hameltion, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠, Randy Kryn and Necrothesp. There are five entries (four of which are WP:DABMENTIONS) listed upon the Very Nice disambiguation page and, since the song's renown does not appear to have spread within the English-speaking world, it seems best to retain the dab page main title header in its existing form. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs)22:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. "Sounds generic" is not one of the criteria for primarytopic. Notable uses of the article title are. Here, there's just one notable use - this song. WP:SMALLDETAILS also applies here. Dohn joe (talk) 23:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per nom and WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Arguments against moving have been adressed in my opinion; no other DABed subject seems to have any sort of primacy or even much independent notability. There's nothing inherently wrong with a "generic" title with another literal meaning when that meaning is clearly out-of-scope to an outside observer; not many people are coming to WP for a description of "very-niceness" Quadrantal (talk) 06:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
