Talk:Very-small-aperture terminal

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

i would like to know more about VSAT

Technology section added

I added a Technology section that describes the underlying technology in much more detail. There is much confusion as to the implementation of the return path (or uplink) that I have tried to address in this section. --KJRehberg 19:36, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updated maritime

I dont quiet understand why someone had linked the VSAT maritime part to BGAN and Inmarsat concidering they are L band based. I changed it to Vizada (Former telenor, page needed?) and Eutelsat. (Fredde87 (talk) 19:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

what's a relation between BGAN and VSAT? I didn't get it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.231.103 (talk) 17:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fghilsgiu giopuops goju —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.98.153.62 (talk) 09:48, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sir i have a share terminal of asit c mehta & im trading via Vsat. no i want to change my broker & my new broker is Globe capital market Ltd. can i use this Vsat for trading if there is any possibility fro it ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.200.240.20 (talk) 16:36, 23 October 2008 (UTC) jkkl;;l_{^{Subscript text} $SmallText$} —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.128.81.32 (talk) 12:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

C-band?

Well, in the beginning of the usage section, it states that VSATs were operating at C-band or 2 GHz. C-band is actually 4-8 GHz,and not 2 GHz. Please make sure you correct the mistake, to those who wrote articles based on the information its time to go back and amend it for correctness Lenamile C Pogiso (talk) 10:45, 27 November 2013) good —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.131.117.90 (talk) 06:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BGAN vs VSAT

BGAN is typically more of a mobile satellite deployment. It offers more flexibility because it does not have to be pointed so precisely at the satellite, it can have a 15 degree variance and still work quite well. It does not offer the same amount of speed as VSAT but is a fast growing market because it can easily be transported and uses low amounts of power and in some cased can even fit inside a back pack.

VSAT is able to handle a much larger through put however must be point precisely at the satellite.

BGAN is like a flash light been which can cover a fairly large area, it works but it's not very concentrated. VSAT is like a spot light or laser beam. It's very focused, and it you miss your target you have a little you missed it completely.

SatelliteOptimization@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.74.11.126 (talk) 20:16, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BGAN vs VSAT

BGAN is typically more of a mobile satellite deployment. It offers more flexibility because it does not have to be pointed so precisely at the satellite, it can have a 15 degree variance and still work quite well. It does not offer the same amount of speed as VSAT but is a fast growing market because it can easily be transported and uses low amounts of power and in some cased can even fit inside a back pack.

VSAT is able to handle a much larger through put however must be point precisely at the satellite.

BGAN is like a flash light been which can cover a fairly large area, it works but it's not very concentrated. VSAT is like a spot light or laser beam. It's very focused, and it you miss your target a little you missed it completely.

SatelliteOptimization@gmail.com

BGAN - inmarsat.com VSAT - Hughesnet.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.74.11.126 (talk) 20:18, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Very-small-aperture terminal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]