Talk:Vertica

Blatant advertising

Isn't it?

Yes, but unless somebody not from Vertica is willing to actually fix it... also, what is the formal company name? I see Vertica Systems, HP Vertica... Jacotto (talk) 16:57, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I think the article should be flagged as potentially inappropriate content, or at least inappropriate content style. Anyone remember how to put a tag on the main page for that? Chafe66 (talk) 23:19, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And also needs to be changed to mostly past tense, since it is no longer a separate company, eaten by HP and then split into HPE etc. W Nowicki (talk) 22:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vertica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131023020945/https://community.vertica.com/vertica to https://community.vertica.com/vertica

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Versions and documentation

What is the purpose of the "Versions and documentation" section, which just lists the names of each version and a reference proving that the version exists? This appears to me to be clearly unencyclopedic and I propose deleting that section, unless someone is willing to expand it to provide some utility. "Six by nine. Forty two." (talk) 13:51, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. What might be useful is a chronology of the introduction of major features, but not just a raw listing of all versions.

Deleted. --Macrakis (talk) 14:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising

@Mean as custard: I've tried to tone down the marketing talk in this article and stick to facts. I did this at the request of a contact at Vertica who was distressed by the Advert banner, but I have no other affiliation with Vertica, and was not compensated in any way for my edits. I'd appreciate it if you'd review the article and see if you think it still warrants an Advert banner. --Macrakis (talk) 23:11, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]