Talk:Veronika Decides to Die (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Production References

I recently removed some references such as http://www.okmagazine.com/news/view/7553 that had no mention whatsoever to the previous statement and, therefore, cannot be considered a reflink. The article states: "Filming of the movie began on May 12 2008, in New York City and finished on June 22 .[Link for reference of the previous article here]". And, upon opening the link aforementioned, it lacks the information needed to establish its reference. My edit has since been reverted and, I am reverting it back with this little explanation with hopes that it won't be reverted again and become an Edit war. Thank you for your time reading this and let's make this a featured article!! -- Loukinho (talk) 06:04, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrap Party is the mention of the previous statement.As for the other edit both Siram Das and Das Films lead to no article so no practical difference though Siram Das does show an article was deleted with that name .Garda40 (talk) 15:11, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good Job!! I also noticed the Siram Das/Das films on the reflink but I thought it would be better to WP:WTAF. But in any cases, since there is no functional difference, let's leave it the way you left. -- Loukinho (talk) 03:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

It may be premature to talk about the reception to the film, but I am rather surprised it is set in New York, given how central to the original the novel is the setting of Slovenia. I think that after we have kept our eyes on any forthcoming receptions, this would make an interesting addition to the article (the film has already received reviews on the Internet Movie Database). ACEOREVIVED (talk) 23:32, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]