Talk:Vermont Route 129/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 19:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • In the lead, you need to add a little bit of context at the very beginning. At the moment, you simply have "Vermont Route 129 is a short connector route from Isle La Motte and Alburg." Now I, as a US reader, have no problem understanding what this means. Someone from another country might not be able to figure out that these are two cities in the state of Vermont in the US, though. So, a little context is in order... Please also add how long the route is to the lead.
   • In the Route description section, you say "Route 129 intersects with a short extension of itself, which terminates quickly." I'm not sure what you mean by this. Please clarify.
   • In the Major intersections box, you have a note for the second entry that originally read "Major Collector 0291". I changed this to "Major Connector 0291" because this seemed to make more sense to me, but I'm still not sure what 0291 stands for. Is this another road? Please make sure my change was correct, and possibly clarify what the number stands for a bit.
   • In the lead you say it was designated F-2 "by 1935", while in the history section you say it was designated "in 1926". Please standardize.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

A few issues with prose, so I am putting the article on hold. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 20:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

All done. :) -Mitch32^(UP) 20:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 20:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)