Talk:Verizon strike of 2016
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Verizon strike of 2016 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Delaware Court of Chancery legal tussle
[edit]Should the Delaware court developments documented here be in the article? This seems important but as this is an ongoing event and not every little bit will be relevant a year or a decade from now, I would like your opinion as an experienced editor, @Anna Frodesiak:. MisterRandomized (talk) 09:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi MisterRandomized. I'm not sure because I cannot view that website (I'm in China where certain sites are blocked.) Is it the same content roughly as here and here? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:14, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- That's certainly a weird one to be blocked since it's a Delaware local news site. Yes, it is substantially the same. MisterRandomized (talk) 09:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- I know. But that's the way it is here. Lots of harmless sites are blocked while others are not. I haven't time to read those articles right now, but will hopefully Monday. Why not decide yourself? Be bold. :) The worst that will happen is a revert or modification. Thanks for taking an interest in the article. I was wondering when someone would show up to add content. Also, it should get good page hits, so I think it's worth it. Cheers. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:07, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- That's certainly a weird one to be blocked since it's a Delaware local news site. Yes, it is substantially the same. MisterRandomized (talk) 09:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)