Jump to content

Talk:Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2002)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notice, this article will be moved for disambiguation purposes

[edit]

I'm working on a page for the recent Verizon v. FCC January 14, 2014 court case. Once it's ready I plan on making a disambiguation page for "Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission". I will then move this page to "Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission(2002)" and my newly created page will live at "Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission(2014)". The disambiguation page will then link to both of them. I plan on doing this in the next 2-3 days so please let me know if this is problematic. Amcconachie (talk) 22:52, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Progress so far

[edit]

Hey! You've got a good start going with this. If it expands a little more in the next few days, it should be eligible for appearing on the "Did You Know" section of Wikipedia's main page. One thing I notice early is that it seems to be largely based on primary sources. Looking into news coverage of this case will probably help establish more context. Keep up the good work!--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 17:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Addition

[edit]

Here is what Obar emailed us. The bolded items were the ones that I changed

|Litigants=Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton Argue Date= Wednesday, October 10, 2001 Decide Date= Monday, May 13, 2002 |USVol=413 |USPage=49 |Citation= |Prior= |Subsequent= |Holding=A civil injunction barring the theatres in question from showing adult films was upheld, however the State's definitions of obscene material must be re-evaluated in light of recent jurisprudence. |SCOTUS=1972-1975 Majority= Souter |JoinMajority= Ginsburg, Rehnquist, Stevens and Thomas |Dissent= Breyer |Join Dissent= Scalia

Brittany Balbaugh (talk) 06:52, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

[edit]

We are adding content based on individual sources so we may have different directions. Once compiled information, I will set the structure, for example: history/background, ruling, notes, etc. J Komara (talk) 23:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a good plan. Let me know if you need help or advice on anything.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 00:12, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Currently working on content and structure, need to update links with appropriate citation. J Komara (talk) 13:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updating sidebar

[edit]

Just to let you know, the sidebar I sent was from another article, you need to fill in the appropriate elements specific to the Verizon case. We can talk about this in the lab. Jaobar (talk) 15:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

coming along

[edit]

Nice work with the recent expansions of this article. I assume it's still being worked on actively, as there are some parts that are just hanging without enough context and empty sections. But just let me know when it's at a point that you want some detailed feedback on it, and I'll give it a close review.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 15:12, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes we have planned to just get the structure we want in and then fill it in on time. Shooting for this week for another content move which should hopefully have it looking full and ready. J Komara (talk) 19:51, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

progress

[edit]

We are attempting to fill in the complete structure by this weeks end. I am not sure if we are still eligible for the DYK or other acknowledgments but wanted to let you know that it can be reviewed this coming week. J Komara (talk) 07:14, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2002). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:47, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2002). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Michigan State University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Verizon_Communications_Inc._v._FCC_(2002)&oldid=1208609041"