Talk:Vacuum extraction

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Vacuum extraction.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Medicine: Reproductive Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as High-importance).

Women's Health Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Merger

Support: I didn't propose the merger originally, but I saw the request on the merger proposal page. I believe that Vacuum extraction should be merged into this article. It's written much better than Vacuum extraction, and Vacuum extraction has little to offer than a picture. If the merger occurs, please redirect Vacuum extraction to Ventouse. Cheers! WiiAlbanyGirl 01:13, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Benedict Phillips

Whats the reference to Benedict Phillips? Someone having a gag? 195.68.31.231 (talk) 12:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict between articles

I noticed that this article and the Obstetrical forceps article both state that said device is safer than the other. Clarification is needed. Thanks! 2605:A601:A18B:2C00:9311:38DE:CA71:3E14 (talk) 12:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]