Talk:Venom: The Last Dance

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Venom: The Last Dance article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Comics: United States / Marvel / Spider-Man / Films Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Spider-Man work group.
	This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

Film: Comic book / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Comic book films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

October 20 to 26, 2024 (4th)
October 27 to November 2, 2024 (11th)

Andy Serkis as Knull

his voice is heard in the promo material 199.187.203.143 (talk) 15:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We need a reliable source for this. giftheck (talk) 10:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Juno Temple and Rhys Ifans

I've previously reverted these as they're added without a source to back them up and the sources provided don't back up their roles either. However, I have found this which does state that Juno Temple is Dr. Payne and Rhys Ifans is 'Martin'. Typically, we don't use YouTube videos like this as sources. However, there should be another source out there for both the Dr. Payne and Martin characters if Sony themselves have come forward with this. giftheck (talk) 10:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toxin?

I've heard conflicting reports on whether or not Toxin is in the movie. Is he in the movie or is the "Green Toxin" a different symbiote? HiGuys69420 (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So in some promotional trailers for the film, when the green symbiote that is attached to Mulligan speaks, the subtitles attached to those trailers identify the symbiote as Toxin. However, there's important context missing. Studios outsource their trailers to specialized creative marketing teams, which often operate without input from the main filmmakers. These teams receive selected scenes, clips, and soundbites to craft a trailer, frequently without the full context only available in the final film. This likely led the trailer team to assume that Mulligan’s green symbiote was Toxin, drawing on the character’s comic history where Toxin is often linked with Mulligan. While what I just noted may be difficult to cite within the article, the film itself can be used to verify that Mulligan was previously bonded with a different symbiote not shown in the film. This is because, in the brief scene where Mulligan is first brought in to the facility, a line of exposition explicitly states that Mulligan was found left for dead by his original symbiote. That unseen symbiote is presumed to be Toxin. Furthermore, the actor Stephen Graham is only credited as his character Patrick Mulligan in the film with no mention of Toxin. UnqstnableTruth (talk) 01:14, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Toxin" isn't mentioned a single time in the entire movie, the symbiote's appearance does not resemble Toxin in the slightest so as of now it is just an unnamed green symbiote Kala7992 (talk) 10:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Do Have Serious Concerns About The Honesty Concerning The Stories Which Keep Claiming Films Need To Make Almost Four Times Their Production Budget In To Make A Profit Are Accurate

I just don't see advertising expenses as that high. I feel it is like Anchorman 2 sponsorship led news stories, which Minneapolis reporter Don Shelby acknowledged had truth to it.[1] Shelby also wasn't the only source who backed the way the film portrayed sponsorship influence over news stories either.[2][3][4] This time, and from a neutral point of view, I feel there is the possibility that companies focused on building their movie theater-rivaling streaming could be the sponsors of such stories.Speakfor23 (talk) 16:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, isn't this a long title? I'm so far looking at a bunch of original research about sponsorship influence, and reads frankly almost like a fringe theory about movie theatre owners being chopped by streamers who want the idea that theatrical... films are.. uh, not commercially viable? Huh? Hey, Wikipedia isn't the place for these strange fringe theories. Barnt Toust 12:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a NPOV claim. There was certainly not "original research" in how the news articles responded to Anchorman 2's portrayal of news sponsors.Speakfor23 (talk) 22:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Have Additional Concerns About How The Deadline Hollywood Article Hyped "Audience Weariness" Of Superhero Films

Deadpool & Wolverine was recently an exception to this, as it made over $1.3 billion worldwide.[5]Speakfor23 (talk) 22:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will this movie have a box office failure?

I mean, will it? Lenny7092 (talk) 18:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]