Talk:Venedic language

This article was nominated for deletion on 2005-07-23. The result of the discussion was keep (no consensus).

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-04-26. The result of the discussion was keep (still no consensus).

	Constructed languages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternate History (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternate History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Alternate HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Alternate HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Alternate HistoryAlternate History articles

Untitled

Speaking of VfD's, it looks like they're trying to get this one again with the "Importance" tag on the Cleanup tag. Wasn't the importance of Wenedyk and other alt-langs and conlangs established during the course of the VfD? Bo-Lingua 00:27, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I see now, most arguments regarding the "importance" of Wenedyk were not stated here, but in the VfD discussion on the German Wikipedia (see here) instead. Among other things, it lists two articles that were written about Wenedyk.

Quite an odd discussion BTW. Eight people voted delete, six people voted keep, and two others voted delete unless the article would be expanded significantly. At some point it was expanded significantly, so in fact the final count should be 8/8. In addition to that you can see that seven out of the eight delete votes (mostly in the form of slogans ridiculising conlangs in general) were issued before the first serious argument in favour of keeping was presented; after that, five people voted keep and only one delete. Yet, that didn't stop the moderator in question to delete the article in the middle of the discussion, merely stating his own opinion as his primary motivation. —IJzeren Jan _{In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij} 12:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a trivia (or not...), did you know that real Polish language as used by nobility in PLC had quite a few Latin words in it? Renaissance in Poland, for example, was effectively bi-lingual, and when one reads letters or diaries from that period, they have a lot of latin words.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 01:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I read a few letters written by Jan III Sobieski. It's indeed quite stunning! I suppose the same phenomenon could also been seen in Wenedyk in those days. —IJzeren Jan _{In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij} 19:15, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Google hits

13,000 hits on Google! This has got to a measure of importance, surely? Koro Neil (talk) 13:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly. Read Wikipedia:Search engine test. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wenedyk speakers?

I there's a Wenedyk speakers? --46.130.138.196 (talk) 10:12, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As a Pole, I can't understand that language at all. Those words *look* Polish but they definitely aren't. 188.47.123.180 (talk) 21:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps if you learned Latin … —Tamfang (talk) 22:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]