Jump to content

Talk:Velaiilla Pattadhari

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Velaiyilla Pattathari/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 10:29, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewer: Kailash29792 (talk) 06:01, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Will review later in the week.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:29, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy

@Dr. Blofeld: I removed the entire part of Poriyaalan. Ssven2 (talk) 07:09, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As Blofeld has resigned from the review, I will take on.... from tomorrow. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:11, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Kailash29792: Oh good Ssven2 (talk) 15:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I just find contemporary Indian movies difficult to be enthusiastic about in assessing with GA quality. I'm never keen on cast sections with that sort of commentary either, it belongs in production. Not that I'm discrediting your hard work on it of course, but it's not the sort of film I'm happy reviewing admittedly and is best done by somebody into such films I think.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:35, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes Blofeld, I too don't often look forward to make 21st century Indian movies GA's due to lack of interest, and they don't look historically significant. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:45, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lead

 Done expanded it to three sections. Ssven2 (talk) 04:54, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

 Done actors' names removed. Ssven2 (talk) 04:54, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

 Done as asked. Ssven2 (talk) 05:15, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Impressive. Now how about reducing the character descriptions as much as possible? This is optional, but I am only asking so that it does not give away spoilers. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:01, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done as asked Ssven2 (talk) 06:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done replaced the reference. Ssven2 (talk) 15:18, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Production

 Done as asked. Ssven2 (talk) 07:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done written Velaiyilla Pattathari. Ssven2 (talk) 07:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done as asked. Ssven2 (talk) 07:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done as asked. Ssven2 (talk) 07:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Themes and influences

 Done as asked. Ssven2 (talk) 07:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done placed it in "Themes". The heading is now "Themes and influences". Ssven2 (talk) 08:45, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Music

 Done as asked. Ssven2 (talk) 07:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done written "criticised". written "He" instead of "The newspaper" with "He" referring to Srinivasa Ramanujam. Ssven2 (talk) 07:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done written "TOP 10 ALBUMS". Ssven2 (talk) 07:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Release

 Done He bought the film's TN theatrical rights but none of the references specify the amount. Ssven2 (talk) 07:55, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • "The movie was released in 350 screens in Tamil Nadu. The key regions were Chengalpattu (60), Kovai (65), Madurai (30), Trichy (30) and Salem (55)" - say "film" not "movie". And try to rephrase the second sentence for more clarity. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:37, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done re-written the sentence. Ssven2 (talk) 07:55, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done as asked. Ssven2 (talk) 04:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Critical response

 Done as asked. But The Hindu, Sify and The New Indian Express don't use star ratings. Ssven2 (talk) 04:16, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Box office

@Kailash29792: Actually, both Tamilboxoffice1 and Bollywood Hungama get their box office collection data from Rentrak. So that is the main reason I used the source. If you want me to remove it, I'll do so by all means. Ssven2 (talk) 07:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If that is so, does Rentrak have any info on the BO collections of the film? If so, please use it. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Kailash29792: I need to have an account on rentrak for that. But, I removed the references for Tamilboxoffice1 (both of them that were on the article page). Ssven2 (talk) 08:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's all Ssven. Now just settle the David/Goliath thingy, and this review is passed (you settle them today, then VIP becomes your second GA in 24 hours!) Kailash29792 (talk) 08:10, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done @Kailash29792: replaced the David/Goliath thingy. Ssven2 (talk) 08:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, M Suganth's (TOI writer) comparision of the hero and villain to David/Goliath should be preferably in "themes". Kailash29792 (talk) 08:22, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done @Kailash29792: as asked Ssven2 (talk) 08:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's it Ssven, congratulations! As I Pass this, you have earned your second GA in 24 hours. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:50, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 19 external links on Velaiilla Pattadhari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]