Talk:Veiled Rebecca of Salar Jung Museum
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Veiled Rebecca of Salar Jung Museum was copied or moved into Veiled Rebecca with this edit on 17:24, 21 November 2015. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Veiled Rebecca of Salar Jung Museum redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Merger proposal
[edit]I propose that Veiled Rebecca of Salar Jung Museum be merged into Veiled Rebecca. While the Salar Jung version is relatively better structured with more detail, the differences are minor. These differences can be ported over. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 14:30, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- @Cpt.a.haddock: Merge performed as it is unopposed since long time.--Vin09 (talk) 07:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Vin09: Thanks for looking into this :) My request was actually for the merge to be performed the other way around. The main article should be Veiled Rebecca (as there are four copies only one of which is the Salar Jung piece). Could you sort this out too? Cheers.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 07:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Cpt.a.haddock: But you mentioned the Salar Jung version is relatively better structured with more detail. So did that way.--Vin09 (talk) 07:36, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Vin09: I've reverted the redirects. I'll get this done after seeing if a history merge (or similar) is possible/required. Thanks.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 09:05, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Cpt.a.haddock: But you mentioned the Salar Jung version is relatively better structured with more detail. So did that way.--Vin09 (talk) 07:36, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Vin09: Thanks for looking into this :) My request was actually for the merge to be performed the other way around. The main article should be Veiled Rebecca (as there are four copies only one of which is the Salar Jung piece). Could you sort this out too? Cheers.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 07:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)