Talk:Veeam Software
Appearance
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Former deletions
[edit]Earlier versions of this article were put up for deletion discussion (Afd):
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veeam in 2011 with the result to delete;
- Deleted 14 January 2011; recreated ?
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veeam Software in 2013 with the result to delete.
- Deleted 28 November 2013; userfied 13 January 2014; recreated 11 March 2014 by Alexander88cherkasov
--Bejnar (talk) 02:22, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Can I help?
[edit]Hi, I'm new in this community. Can I help you with fixes for this article? 06:24, 3 March 2014 User:Alexander88cherkasov
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was previously moved per below, but left unclosed.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:14, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
User:Vmexpert/Veeam → Veeam – This page should be moved to “Veeam”, because Veeam Software follows the notability criteria:
- It is well covered in media. Source: Google News
- Company is a winner of major industry awards. Source: [1]
Sotlex (talk) 13:30, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- support and moving no controversy here. Tiggerjay (talk) 08:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.