Talk:Vauquelin-class destroyer

Vauquelin-class destroyer has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 15, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / European / French

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Vauquelin-class destroyer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 20:58, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 20:58, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Entering service in 1933–1934, the sister ships spent most of their careers in the Mediterranean Link the Mediterranean.
When France declared war on Germany in September 1939 Pipe Germany to Nazi Germany.
to support the Allied forces in the Norwegian Campaign and Maillé Brézé --> "to support the Allied forces in the Norwegian campaign and Maillé Brézé"
- Norwegian Campaign is a proper name so both words are capitalized
a bombardment of Italian coastal facilities after Italy entered the war in June Pipe Italy to the Kingdom of Italy.
Like their predecessors, the Vauquelin class contre-torpilleurs was designed as fleet scouts About whom are we talking about the predecessors?
- Reworded
Their hull (ship) What's this? Unnecessary vertical bar.
to drop 40 Breguet B4 530-kilogram (1,170 lb) mines Try to avoid two separate numbers next to each other.
was provided by a Mle 1929 electro-mechanical fire-control computer Is there a link for the Mle 1929 electro-mechanical?
- Nope.
and an auxiliary Mle 1919 fire-control computer Same as above but now with Mle 1919?
In the table the date of the complete of the ship Le Chevalier Paul this article claims 20 April 1934 while the ship's article it is 20 July 1934 which one is correct?
On 27 August 1939, in anticipation of war with Nazi Germany Unlink Nazi Germany.

Infobox

Looks good to me.

Images

File:French destroyers Vauquelin and Kersaint scuttled at Toulon in November 1942.jpg There is a MM/DD/YYYY.
- That's the date that it happened, not the date of the photo.

@Sturmvogel 66: Yes indeed but the article uses a MM/DD/YYYY which we should replace with a DD/MM/YYYY. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:13, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

D'oh!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Recognition drawing of a French 2400-tonne class destroyer c1941.png hasn't a Naval History and Heritage Command's tag same with File:French destroyer Chevalier Paul moored to a buoy c1934.jpg and File:French destroyers Vauquelin and Kersaint scuttled at Toulon in November 1942.jpg. Is there a reason why some of the images have these tags and others don't?
- Yes, the drawing isn't a photo so it lacks some of the fields that the photos use. But I've added the NHHC licensing banner.

Sources

Looks good to me.

That's it from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 20:08, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 10:23, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CPA-5:--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry I tottally fogot all my GANs because I sturgle right now with my time. I will have a look at this. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 15:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think I finally can pass this one. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 18:27, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]