Talk:Vaughan Grylls

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Potential COI

A major contributor to this article, User:Vaughangrylls (edits), appears to be the subject of it, and has only contributed to this one article, so I'm tagging it as COI. Equally the majority of the article is covered by only a dozen or so references (compared to 44 overall), with 25% of them coming in the very last section, which is just a list. I'm not familiar with the art scene, but I'm hoping someone interested in the subject (who isn't the subject) can sort this out! Thanks BulbaThor (talk) 10:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Transparent self-publicity, not of encyclopaedic interest

Not only is almost all of the article about Vaughan Grylls written by user Vaughan Grylls, but:

- most of it comes from his own web site, mostly verbatim;

- it is hard to find much of substance about him, beyond post-art-school 'novelty art'.

This is transparently a self-publicity article and has little or nothing of note warranting a place in an encyclopaedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.87.38 (talk) 09:11, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rermoved COI-tag

I removed the {{COI}} tag, as the text has been rewritten by a non-COI editor. Asav (talk) 10:15, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The text has had minor edits done to it by an editor with two edits in five years, both on this article. Both their user page and talk page are solely concerned with editing this article. I'm not convinced that is satisfactory, as the bulk of the article has still been contributed by the subject of it, and it's still full of unreferenced claims like 'is perhaps best known' and 'a pioneer of Conceptual Art', and the section on Hockney is massively POV - 'Hockney's long-established fame and formidable media machine' for example. I'm putting the tag back up, if nobody is willing to re-write and reference to an acceptable standard I'll just remove any information that should be sourced. BulbaThor (talk) 15:50, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updates, April 2018

I added some references and removed some unsourced info from the article, and also gave a once-over for neutral language. I think the article is now written in a more encyclopedic tone so I removed some of the tags. Feel free to discuss. Duck Anvil (talk) 18:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag (December 2021)

See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Vaughan Grylls Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:47, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]