Talk:Vatican Railway/GA1
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Like what User:Ruslik0 said, this article is short, concise, and well-referenced. As part of the GA Sweeps, I believe that this article maintained its quality and should maintain its GA status. OhanaUnitedTalk page 22:29, 2 August 2009 (UTC)