Talk:Various Positions

Canada: Music Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.

Roots music

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Contract

Tom,

How come you removed the line about Cohen not being under contract with Columbia at the time? I have been trying to remember the source, and I think it might be The Complete Guide to the Music of Leonard Cohen by Maurice Ratcliff. – Hattrem 03:53, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'll check it - as far I know, Cohen told that he NEVER lost the contract with Columbia and it was never questioned, although all was thinking that when DOALM was released at Spector's Warner. In any case, Columbia/Sony released VP in Europe, and I know for sure that Cohen did not know they will not put the album out - he discovered that *after* his talk to that guy, while he was browsing thru the catalogue of Columbia's forthcoming releases and didn't find his record.Tomsak 14:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nadel doesn't mention any problems with contract, he only says that Cohen recorded the album for CBS in CBS's studio in NYC, and then they decided not to release it. (Also, he says Passport was sublabel of Jem Records). Tomsak 13:51, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for checking it up. – Hattrem 16:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Scaruffis review

i'm gonna remove it, a long time ago i battled to get scaruffi of of the list for reliable critics, and i was victoriuos, so damn him, this album has 3 others, so we don't need the old beatles hater. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.79.152.84 (talk) 02:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

His/her

In the first paragraph, when it says "...after his work on harmonies and backing vocals...", I think it should be "...after HER work on harmonies and backing vocals..." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.18.252.125 (talk) 02:00, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Date of recording

Is there any evidence for the recording in June 1983 (summer of 1983)? Since it was released first in December 1984 it is quite long before.

N.B.: It's June 1984 on the French Wikipedia site. 217.149.169.120 (talk) 18:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]