Talk:Variations on a Rococo Theme

Russia Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical music: Compositions

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Adaptations Section is confusing

I know the work was revised by the composer at some point and a few of the variations were reordered, but the section starts off with the flugelhorn version which is a different (and more trivial) adaptation. Could someone who understands the composer-adaptation better clean this up a bit? DavidRF 15:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notes regarding external link to "original" score

I am a cellist, and am currently playing the Urtext edition published by Peters Edition, London. The IMSLP "original" full score and cello part differ in several places from this Urtext edition: the IMSLP Variation IV and the final coda after Variation VIII are actually reworkings by Fitzenhagen. This can be clearly seen in the Peters Urtext edition, which prints separately Tchaikovsky's original and Fitzenhagen's reworking for both these parts. Since the notes on the IMSLP page can't seem to be edited, I thought the next best thing would be to put the notice over here.Piatigorsky (talk) 13:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible typo or incorrect date in introduction.

I am confused about the statement that Tchaikovsky worked on this until 1941, when he died about 38 years prior to 1941.66.87.125.4 (talk) 20:38, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, I think you've misread it.

Tchaikovsky wrote this piece for and with the help of Wilhelm Fitzenhagen, a German cellist and fellow-professor at the Moscow Conservatory. Fitzenhagen gave the premiere in Moscow on November 30, 1877, with Nikolai Rubinstein conducting. This was perhaps the only hearing of the Variations as Tchaikovsky wrote the piece until 1941, when it was played in Moscow without Fitzenhagen's by-then-standard emendations.

This is saying that the piece as Tchaikovsky wrote it was played at the 1877 premiere, but then probably not again until 1941. In between, what was played was the version that included Fitzenhagen's alterations, and this version had become the standard version. But if you find this sentence confusing, maybe other do too, and we ought to think abour recasting it. -- Jack of Oz ^{[your turn]} 21:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The lead doesn't explain why this is notable

I'm fairly certain the article is notable, but the lead does not explain why. Very Average Editor (talk) 18:58, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]