Talk:Vantix Diagnostics

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (I'm working on adding references! I think this article will pass our notability guidelines once I've got the references in there) --NickCT (talk) 14:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Peppy Paneer: - Hey, could I ask that you temporarily withdraw your speedy deletion request? Give me a few minutes to see if I can track down enough references to pass notability? If you still think there's no indication of notability in an hour, you're free to re-apply for speedy. Thanks, NickCT (talk) 14:45, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NickCT: Removed :) Peppy Paneer (talk) 14:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Peppy Paneer: - Thanks mate! NickCT (talk) 14:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Peppy Paneer: - OK. I think I've got enough references to support notability. Appreciate any comments/criticism you might have. NickCT (talk) 15:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NickCT: Hi, references 5 & 6 does not contain URL. You may check. And I found 1 which could be used in the article. Cheers! Peppy Paneer (talk) 05:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]