Talk:Vanier Cup

Vanier Cup is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 10, 2007	Featured list candidate	Promoted

Canada: Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Canadian football High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canadian football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canadian football and the Canadian Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Canadian footballWikipedia:WikiProject Canadian footballTemplate:WikiProject Canadian footballCanadian football articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment

I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains a fair amount of detail and organization, although it requires more referencing. I have assessed this as low importance, as it is a highly specialized topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 05:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Room for improvement

The logo needs to be updated for the 2007 Desjardins Vanier Cup. Permission to use the logo from www.vaniercup.ca from the management company. Akooren 20:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Vanier Cup CoordinatorAkooren 20:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update the Logo

For the 2007 Desjardins Vanier Cup, the logo needs to be updated. Permission to use the logo from www.vaniercup.ca. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Akooren (talk • contribs) 20:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry Photo Needs to be Removed or Replaced

Although there is no set in stone policy, it is common convention not to include blurry images in Wikipedia articles. Nothing against the 41st Vanier Cup, but "File:Laurier Golden Hawks - 2005 Vanier Cup champions.jpg" does not look professional and only makes the article look amateurish. Edit out the blurry picture, there is no reason for it to be there.
- Warsilver

Oh joy, this again. Yes, it's a bit blurry, but it's not horrible. It's inclusion achieves a few things:

It shows another team from a different conference with the cup (the current image shows a Western team)
it shows a Cup winning team from the 2000s (the previous one is from the 90s)
it shows a bit more of the presentation ceremony than the other image.

The image clearly adds something to the article, and doesn't detract from it. Besides, if you can find a different image that achieves the aforementioned goals, then feel free to add it. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 04:27, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why not post a blurry picture of every Vanier Cup game in history? It would hold the same kinds of rationale Scorpion0422 is using for this picture (that it shows something different, different year, different presentation ceremonies). The only reason Scorpion0422 wants this picture up is because it is their own blurry photo, making them feel special. It makes the article look amateurish, as if CIS football doesn't get enough criticism for being very amateurish. Any blurry photos in the Wikipedia articles of the BCS National Championship Game or AFCA National Championship Trophy or even any individual NCAA bowl game (e.g. 2006 Rose Bowl)? No. Your "justifications" are not consistent with keeping this photo. It needs to be replaced or removed.
- Warsilver

Beggers can't be choosers. There are plenty of wikipedia articles out there with less than perfect pictures, particularily bios. If there was a better picture that I kept replacing, then your accusations of bias would be apt. When a better picture shows up, go ahead and replace it. Either way, you and me bickering back and forth isn't solving anything, so let's see if anyone else would like to comment. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 07:58, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Vanier Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]