Jump to content

Talk:Vanier, Ontario

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

<moved from User talk:Docu>

If you want it in those categories, then start a separate article at List of mayors of Vanier, Ontario; the title Vanier, Ontario does not contain the word "mayor", and thus does not belong in a "mayors" category. Bearcat 08:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

</moved from User talk:Docu>


The article title is marginally relevant to the categorization. The question is: "Is there a list of mayors in this article?". If the answer is yes, then add Category:Lists of mayors. -- User:Docu


"Drugs and prostitution are common on many of the side streets." -- Shouldn't this need a reference? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.147.54.3 (talk) 05:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The population of 16,609 is, I think, wrong. There is no source provided for that number. The STATSCAN link below cites a population of 111,508 for the Vanier, ON federal electoral district. This is quite a bit larger than the proper neighbourhood of Vanier. Does anyone have a reliable source for the neighbourhood population of Vanier? How do we define those boundaries? Google Map defines it roughly between the Rideau River and St. Laurent east to west, and Beachwood to McArthur North to South. The Kanata, ON page computes it by combining census tracts, but I don't know how to find out the census tracts for Vanier. Any suggestions would be great.

https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=FED&Code1=35078&Geo2=PR&Code2=35&Data=Count&SearchText=K1L7X7&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=01&B1=All&TABID=2

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Vanier,+Ottawa,+ON/@45.4380662,-75.6706451,15.16z/data=!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x4cce0514d8d31d0f:0x14261a217814f503!2sVanier,+Ottawa,+ON!3b1!8m2!3d45.4370851!4d-75.658968!3m4!1s0x4cce0514d8d31d0f:0x14261a217814f503!8m2!3d45.4370851!4d-75.658968

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanata%2C_Ontario#cite_note-3 Thehungrylumberjack (talk) 20:48, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is most certainly correct, but it does need a source, so I will provide one. The Census Tracts follow the former municipal boundaries, which should be used to calculate the population rather than what Google thinks. -- Earl Andrew - talk 22:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]