Talk:Vangelis/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- One slightly annoying thing is that too many paragraphs begin with the "In/On [year/date]," construction.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): 
c (OR):
- Incomplete citations, few of which reference reliable sources. This is the article's biggest problem and it won't be fixed within a week.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Thirty seconds is the limit on music samples, the fair use rationale is lacking, and the caption does not back up the standard FUR (i.e. what specifically does it illustrate?).
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
