Talk:Vanderbilt Triple Palace/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 20:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at this! — Ghost River 20:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

"was generally ~~negatively~~ criticized"

Design

Layout and courtyard

"Doors separated the three residences, but they could be opened to create a large event space." → "The doors separating the three residences could be opened to create a large event space."

Facade

Misplaced period after "However, William Henry"

Features

Add diacritics and WL on papier-mâché
"W.H." → "W. H." per MOS:INITIAL (this shows up a few times)

History

19th century

First sentence of Construction uses "lot" singular, whereas the second sentence uses "lots" plural
"sixty European sculptors" → "60 European sculptors"

20th century

"Among the buyers was" → "Among the buyers were" since you then go on to list two

Critical reception

"was not reviewed positively," → "was received coldly"

References

Good

General comments

Earwig score looks good
No stability concerns in the revision history
Pictures are all public domain (except for one CC0) and relevant

Should be all quick fixes – putting on hold for now. — Ghost River 21:27, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review @GhostRiver. I have done all of these. – Epicgenius (talk) 23:44, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.