Talk:Vancouver special

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Low-importance).

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Images

There are some images on commons that may be useful for this article. --KenWalker | Talk 19:49, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spamlinks

How is it that vancouverspecial.com, a non-commercial database of photographs of the houses is an "unrelated commercial link", but a link to the store that has nothing at all to do with the houses is relevant? Please explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.38.32.196 (talk) 09:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They just hadn't been noticed as spam yet - not just the store named Vancouver Special, but also the CD. I'll add your vancouverspecial.com site, which is a great visual resource, thanks.Skookum1 (talk) 14:29, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Squamish

I'm not going to edit the article, as im not entirely sure how i should word it, since Squamish is not part of metro Vancouver. But the Vancouver Special style of home is also very, very common here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.82.0.234 (talk) 21:24, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The style is common throughout BC now....does this aticle use "Metro Vancouver" as referring to the region? I'll fix that - Metro Vancouver is the name of the govenrment of hte GVRD, as a term it shouldn't be used for the region.Skookum1 (talk) 16:56, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grade

I added a brief inline definition of "grade", since Grade (elevation at earth level) doesn't yet exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.239.240.145 (talk) 15:17, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]