Talk:Van Watervliet family

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Van Watervliet family article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Royalty and Nobility

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles

Heraldry

Are there sources for the arms and badge of the Avery branch? The arms of the associated municipalities are not needed and clutter the page.

Brookford (talk) 00:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the municipal arms. As for the sourcing of the Van Avery arms, only what's available on the associated Wikimedia Commons entries. Let me see if I can find them somewhere else. VABaron (talk) 15:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested Improvements

Thanks for looking at things and for the input.

Three things I've seen come up in the history:

1. Sourcing. This will take some time. Records are thin, some appear to have been destroyed during WWII, but the Dutch are good at getting what they have online.

2. Good input on the family tree and clarifying lines of descent. I'll start working on that.

3. Status of the title. I added a comment on that in the Usage section clarifying. VABaron (talk) 20:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]