Jump to content

Talk:Vampire killing kit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 19:40, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A vampire killing kit in the collection of the Royal Armouries
A vampire killing kit in the collection of the Royal Armouries
  • ... that a vampire killing kit was found to contain a pewter bullet? Source: "Vampire Killing Kit". treasuresontrial.winterthur.org. Winterthur Museum, Garden & Library. Retrieved 31 October 2023.

Created by Geni (talk). Self-nominated at 22:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Vampire killing kit; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Article new enough and long enough. Some spacing and punctuation issues that ought to be resolved. What makes #2 a reliable source? Where does #3 say the case's from 1920 thereabouts? Gonna AGF on a number of sources. Where does #7 say "bun"? #6 and #8 can probably be merged. I kinda wonder about the copyright status of an UK museum exhibit, but per commons:Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Museum and interior photography it might be fine unless the arrangement of the items would be copyrightable. The proposed hooks are a bit lame, each one, however. QPQ is OK. Didn't notice any copyvio or plagiarism. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    2 is Jonathan Ferguson being published by the British Library. The 1920 date is sourced to source 8 with the words 1920 spoken at exactly 2:50. Bun should have been gun. The photo is covered by Commons:Freedom_of_panorama/Europe#United_Kingdom.©Geni (talk) 15:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    That only leaves the hook as a problem. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The standard for hooks is "likely to be perceived as unusual or intriguing by readers with no special knowledge or interest". Pretty much anything about a vampire killing kit is going to qualify as intriguing (citation Ripley's Believe It or Not! has one on display). The vampires are well enough known not to count as a special knowledge or interest. Of the two hooks the pewter bullets qualify as unusual as while silver bullets are a common concept pewter is not. The donation to the Mercer Museum qualifies as intriguing as it pushes that vampire killing kits are not only a thing but the kind of thing that has been in museum collections for some decades.©Geni (talk) 16:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
for ALT1 Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:51, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Skeptical 1992 article

[edit]

HARRY, L. (1992, Oct 11). SOMETHING IS ROTTEN IN TRANSYLVANIA: [THIRD EDITION]. Morning Call

Can be found through proquest.©Geni (talk) 08:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rinker, H. L. (1992, Dec 13). WILKIE BUST LIGHT CAN'T HOLD A CANDLE TO ROOSEVELT MODEL: [THIRD EDITION]. Morning Call
Rinker revisits the topic and apparently receives evidence of a 1986 sale.©Geni (talk) 08:33, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]