Talk:Valu (film)

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in February 2012.

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved, proposer appears to agree with the oppose. There may be a better title for this article, if usage in reliable sources can be found. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valu – the bull → Valu – Article should be moved back to its original released name "Valu". Somebody moved it to the current article name. Even IMDB says considers "Valu" as the original name. As original title page exists, move is not permitted. Valu at IMDb Thanks. - Vivvt^Talk 20:42, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. If WP were an encyclopedia of film, I would support the proposed move. But it is not!
The present title is not ideal, for two reasons: its punctuation is arbitrary and irregular; it is useless to most readers, since they can have no inkling that the topic is a film. That is primary information. But the situation would be worse with the bare title "Valu", which figures in a large number of existing titles as a commercial respelling of "value" (see this internal WP search), and also in other ways. Because the topic is obscure for most readers, the title Valu (film) would be optimal. Short, undoubtedly helpful and beneficial in a worldwide encyclopedia, a disadvantage to no one, anywhere, ever. Noetica^Tea? 23:28, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Makes more sense. Thanks. - Vivvt^Talk 23:44, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, this proposal would be appropriate per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:PRECISION. However, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) indicates: use the title more commonly recognized by English readers. In this case, I think that would be The Wild Bull, as listed at IMDb. ENeville (talk) 00:35, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is recognized as Valu by the English readers. Only IMDB recognizes it by that name. (Don't know why. But weird!) §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 15:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I could imagine that such might be the case, but do we have any evidence in reliable sources to that effect? ENeville (talk) 15:40, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.meemarathi.tv/marathiworld/categories.php?cat_id=232
Triggered by \bmeemarathi\.tv\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 18:54, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Valu (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081210144307/http://www.expressindia.com:80/latest-news/Marathi-film-ValuThe-Wild-Bull-premieres-at-Rotterdam/267089/ to http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Marathi-film-ValuThe-Wild-Bull-premieres-at-Rotterdam/267089/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]