Talk:Valley Fort RFC

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (22)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (291)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,045)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,464) • Stub-Class articles (6,712)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (390) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,343)

Rugby union Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edition issues!

Hi i've contributed to the article just now. Yes, i'm the one who gave this article its fancy professional-looking info box hehe :P. But I'm having trouble with the infobox and the team colour socks. I copy and pasted the rugby team infobox from the London Wasps's article.
For some reason the extra fields that i've added in the infobox will not appear on the proper article (please see the edit-page, you'll find many more extra fields in the box!XD).
Even though i was successful in changing the jersey colours to the Valley Fort pattern, i failed trying to change the colour of the team-socks to black with red stripe but it stayed as it is (Wasp's colour black with gold.)
Please can some nice wiki-expert who's not noob like me :P help me with this? PLEASE!! lol Much appreciated!:)

--WiKID Daryl (talk) 19:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright the socks problem is sorted now, but i'm still having problems getting the sleeves of the jersey in the right colour. The colour strangely becomes anything but the colour that i typed in. For instance, it'll turn blue when i type 'velvet' or 'light-red'!!! This must be somthing to do with the Lonond Wasps copy that i used. The infobox problem is still not sovled too!!!! arrggghhh!!! Also i cannot change the pattern of the shorts to File:Kit shorts Moseley for some reason... Can someone help? thanks.
--WiKID Daryl (talk) 21:39, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reason against speedy deletion

Reason against Speedydeletion: Note- I am NOT THE CREATOR and was allowed to REMOVE THE SPEEDY DELETION PLEA.
This is UNFAIR!! First I SPENT A WHOLE DAY on this, please tell me why i would not object it from being wiped out! Secondly, The Club is a registered, reknown and internationally recognized Rugby union club competing not just locally but also overseas. SO, If Hong Kong Football Club, TDW Nomads, Nomads RFC or even the Hong Kong Rugby Football Union or the London Wasps CAN EXIST here on wikipedia, please TELL ME WHY THIS PAGE IS TO BE DELETED! The FACT IS, they are all IMPORTANT. Valley Fort RFC, HKFC and TDW Nomads RFC are EQUALLY REKNOWN and EQUALLY IMPORTANT in SPREADING; RAISING THE PROMINENCE of; and SUSTAINING the DEVELOPMENT OF; YOUTH, ADULT AND SOCIAL RUGBY UNION IN HONG KONG.

If you think the importantce of one organisation that carries the above mission can BE IGNORED, then you must, you damn well have to UNDERMINE THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY WHICH DOES THAT. THis includes; namely; the Hong Kong Rugby Football Union!!

This page is NOT 'PATENT NONSENSE', not a 'TEST PAGE', not 'VANDALISM', not 'RECREATION', not a 'HOUSEKEEPING PAGE', not a 'TALK PAGE WITH NO CONTENT', not a page 'SERVING NO PURPOSE BUT TO DISPARAGE ITS SUBJECT, not 'BLATANT ADVERTISING', not 'BLATANT COPYRIGHT-INFRINGING, not a 'FOREIGN LANGUAGE ARTICLE ON OTHER WIKIMEDIA', not a 'TRANSWIKIED ARTICLE', not a 'REDRIRECT PAGE. There IS 'CONTEXT', there 'OBVIOUSLY IS 'CONTENT'. I think that us MORE THAN ENOUGH to stand against A SINGLE 'suitability for speedydeletion'.

most of all, I DID NOT REQUEST IT TO BE DELETED! & I'M NOT BANNED

A simple glance and you can see how much information is presented on this page. This page HAS MORE CONTENT than Hong Kong Football Club, TDW Nomads or Nomads RFC, why should this be OUTCONTESTED?.
Sorry for the capital letters, they are meant to flame. If you happen to be a wiki editor who just spent hours completing a very detailed and meaningful article decicated to a loved and respected society and someone just comes along; correcting you several times...and then proceed to nominate your page for deletion after all the cleaning he made; you'll probably be empathetic as to why i'm utterly pissed off.

P.S. User: Ukexpat, why have you edited and corrected me so much if you intended to delete this page?
--WiKID Daryl (talk) 23:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]