Talk:Valle de la Pascua

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Venezuela Low‑importance

	Venezuela portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.
	This article was automatically prioritized by a bot per the category key. Please ensure that the importance value is appropriate before removing the `\|autoi=yes` parameter.

Candlemas Fair

The Spanish Wikipedia at es:Cultura de Valle de la Pascua says 15,000 attended at 1939-1940 fair, without citation. IP editor 190.77.43.172 changed it to 80,000 without citation; this does not seem reasonable given the population of the area at the time. --Bejnar (talk) 01:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Population

The Spanish Wikipedia at es:Valle de la Pascua#Contexto geográfico says that the population is 110,000 without citation or date. MiPunto.com gives 70,000 for the population. IP editor 190.77.43.172 changed it to 205,658 (est. 2008) indicating an 8% annual rate of increase, at least as I interpret the entry "Poputation: (205.658 people 2008) 8% anual". That regresses to about 110,000 in 2000. However 8% annual population increases are very rare, and even rarer over a period of eight years. --Bejnar (talk) 01:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo la pascua.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Escudo la pascua.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Escudo la pascua.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:37, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why not to use Spanish Wikipedia entry

I removed the "expand from Spanish Wikipedia" tag, as the Spanish article has serious problems, specifically with lack of verification in reliable sources. It is also tagged for failure to conform with other Wikipedia guidelines. --Bejnar (talk) 17:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Valle de la Pascua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]