Talk:Valet de chambre

A fact from Valet de chambre appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 April 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,370 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the court appointment of valet de chambre, nominally as a personal servant, was given to a wide range of artists, musicians, poets and others, including the first air crash fatality?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/April.

Wikipedia

Untitled

I have added this new page, separate from Valet. If somebody really feels they should be merged, do so. I really felt like that article was more concerned with the modern use of the term and its appropriation into English, instead of the use that it has, especially amongst artists in the Burgendian court, in historical court culture. In this sense it is not a "male servant"-type position, but a newly established court title. --Stomme (talk) 14:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anne

Notwithstanding the reference, was Anne de Montmorency acting as secretary whilst a varlet? He was later promoted to other roles, including Grand Master of France?

"At the most prestigious level it could be akin to a monarch or ruler's personal secretary, as was the case of Anne de Montmorency at the court of Francis I of France.[1]" Johnbod (talk) 15:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admittedly, the referenced source is a bit old-fashioned, and probably not the most authoritative answer on the subject, but it was the best I could dig up with the limited resources I had. Keep in mind, the Burlington pages cited are an early attempt to define "Valet de chambre" in an art historical manner (1912). Having said that, it is essentially two letters: a response to a book review by the book's author and an answer from the reviewer. The author uses the example of Anne de Montmorency to stress the high level that might be meant by "valet de chambre" within courtly society, while the answer writer-reviewer refers to the same example to argue the fluidity that the term could hold—doubting that Anne de Montmorency and a painter accepted the position on equal terms. I'm sure there are some better descriptions available, written with modern academic rigidity, but it helped me get something in place. At which point I want to thank you for your additions (you seem much more comfortable wandering around the halls of nobility and reporting your findings here than I do)... --Stomme (talk) 16:17, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, about the reference to "personal secretary"—there might be a bit of extrapolation in there that got carried over from what I was trying to get out of the information that already existed on valet and vague comments read in various biographies (I plead lazy research on that one). --Stomme (talk) 16:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks - there are the two valet/secretaries to Queens, so I suppose it's ok. I had already done Alexandre Bontemps, & improving WP coverage of the workings of courts (rather than long lists of holders of ceremonial titles like Lord of the Bedchamber) is one of my aims, so this is a welcome addition. I will put this up for DYK, if that's ok. Johnbod (talk) 18:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jan van Eyck 091.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Jan van Eyck 091.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions

What should I do?

Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:34, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]