Talk:Valeri Polyakov/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Astrocog (talk • contribs • count) 14:17, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this article today and tomorrow. Please be patient. AstroCog (talk) 14:17, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
I'm putting this on hold for now so that editors can expand the article to give it broader scope and to try and find appropriate images.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Seems fine thus far. There's a reference in Russian, which of course I can't read to verify, but it appears legit.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Article is pretty small, only focusing really on this person's long-duration flight. What about the other aspects of this person's life. How are they received by their country? Do they contribute anything else worth writing about besides the long-duration flight? Information about pre-cosmonaut days and personal life are very matter-of-fact, without giving a broader context for this person. I guess I would like to see some expansion of this article for it to feel "broad in coverage" to me.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Seems fine.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Seems fine.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- No images in main article whatsoever. I'm sure there's appropriate images somewhere of this cosmonaut, his spacecraft, the launch, etc.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: All issues resolved and article has been improved since review.
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: