Talk:Valentine Warner

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

Do you think that, in view of the recent Russell Brand Show prank telephone calls row, it could be controversial to call him "The Russell Brand of the kitchen"? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:06, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some rather less contentious comparisons may be with Just William or with Bertie Wooster, both of which were made in the Radio Times for July 11-17, 2009.ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:45, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the remark "This plainly elucidates the real reason why he was employed at the nepotistic, class orientated BBC." This is opinion, and a rather nasty opinion at that. (86.138.114.194 (talk) 19:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I have added "by whom?", "which?" and "citation needed" to the last sentence. I cannot find any source that can substantiate the remark, but it does sound like something he might conceivably do, so I am leaving it there. (78.105.162.51 (talk) 10:00, 23 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]